52304-36-6CCCCN(CCC(=O)OCC)C(C)=OVZRKEAFHFMSHCD-UHFFFAOYSA-NEthyl 3-(N-butylacetamido)propionate is a tertiary carboxamide, a member of acetamides and an ethyl ester.
52304-36-6DTXSID9035753CHEMBL2230259Colorless to slightly yellowish liquid
Liquid at room temperature
In water, 7.0X10+4 mg/L at 20 °C
Soluble in n-heptane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, p-xylene, acetone, methanol
Sicherheitsangaben dienen nur zur Orientierung und ersetzen weder das Sicherheitsdatenblatt (SDB) des Lieferanten noch geltende Vorschriften oder eine fachliche Bewertung.
This chemical does not meet GHS hazard criteria for 3.6% (6 of 168) of reports.
Warning
H319 (96.4%): Causes serious eye irritation [Warning Serious eye damage/eye irritation]
P264+P265, P280, P305+P351+P338, and P337+P317 (click each P-code to see the statement)
Aggregated GHS information provided per 168 reports by companies from 4 notifications to the ECHA C&L Inventory.
Warning
Suitable extinguishing media: Use water spray, alcohol-resistant foam, dry chemical or carbon dioxide.
Advice for firefighters: Wear self-contained breathing apparatus for firefighting if necessary.
For ethyl 3-(N-butylacetamido)propionate (USEPA/OPP Pesticide Code: 113509) ACTIVE products with label matches. /SRP: Registered for use in the USA but approved pesticide uses may change periodically and so federal, state and local authorities must be consulted for currently approved uses./
IR3535 is an insect repellent for application to human skin and clothing in public health applications, to repel biting arthropods such as mosquitoes, flies and ticks.
... Current prevention tools /for zika and other arboviruses/ are mainly represented by the employ of mosquito repellents, light-colored clothes covering as much of the body as possible, and sleeping under mosquito nets. Concerning chemically derived repellents, the number of these products has been considerably reduced by the European Community. Therefore, there are rather few compounds left, including DEET (N,Ndiethyl-m-toluamide), IR3535 (3-N-acetyl-N-butylamino-proprionic ethyl ester), icaridin (i.e. Saltidin, 1-piperidine-carboxylic acid 2-2 hydroxyethyl-1-methylester), and also an Eucalyptus citriodora derivative (para-menthane-3,8-diol)
Avon SSS Skin-So-Soft Gentle Breeze Bug Guard Plus IR3535 Insect Repellent (New Avon LLC): Active ingredient: .beta.-Alanine, N-acetyl-N-butyl-, ethyl ester 7.5%.
Avon SSS Skin-So-Soft Bug Guard Plus IR3535 Insect Repellent SPF 30 Moisturizing Sunblock Lotion Cool 'N Fabulous (New Avon LLC): Active ingredient: .beta.-Alanine, N-acetyl-N-butyl-, ethyl ester 7.5%.
Avon Skin-So-Soft SSS Bug Guard Plus IR3535 Insect Repellent Spray Gentle Breeze (New Avon LLC): Active ingredient: .beta.-Alanine, N-acetyl-N-butyl-, ethyl ester 7.5%.
Avon Skin-So-Soft SSS Bug Guard Plus IR3535 Insect Repellent SPF 15 Sunscreen Spray Gentle Breeze (New Avon LLC): Active ingredient: .beta.-Alanine, N-acetyl-N-butyl-, ethyl ester 7.5%.
For more Formulations/Preparations (Complete) data for Ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate (23 total), please visit the HSDB record page.
Travelers are confronted with a variety of vector-borne threats. Is one type of repellent effective against all biting vectors? The aim of this review is to examine the literature, up to December 31st, 2012, regarding repellent efficacy. We searched PubMed for relevant papers. Repellents of interest were DEET, Icaridin as well as other piperidine-derived products (SS220), Insect Repellent (IR) 3535 (ethyl-butylacetyl-amino-propionat, EBAAP) and plant-derived products, including Citriodora (para-menthane-3,8-diol). As vectors, we considered the mosquito species Anopheles, Aedes and Culex as well as the tick species Ixodes. We selected only studies evaluating the protective efficacy of repellents on human skin. We reviewed a total of 102 publications. Repellents were evaluated regarding complete protection time or as percentage efficacy [%] in a time interval. We found no standardized study for tick bite prevention. Regarding Aedes, DEET at concentration of 20% or more, showed the best efficacy providing up to 10 hr protection. Citriodora repellency against this mosquito genus was lower compared to the other products. Also between subspecies a difference could be observed: Ae. aegypti proved more difficult to repel than Ae. albopictus. Fewer studies have been conducted on mosquito species Anopheles and Culex. The repellency profile against Anopheles species was similar for the four principal repellents of interest, providing on average 4-10 hr of protection. Culex mosquitoes are easier to repel and all four repellents provided good protection. Few studies have been conducted on the tick species Ixodes. According to our results, the longest protection against Ixodes scapularis was provided by repellents containing IR3535, while DEET and commercial products containing Icaridin or PMD showed a better response than IR3535 against Ixodes ricinus. Many plant-based repellents provide only short duration protection. Adding vanillin 5% to plant-based repellents and to DEET repellents increased the protection by about 2 hr.
Keine Reaktionsaufzeichnungen unter den aktuellen Filterkriterien.
Wird geladen…
CHEBI:81991ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES: Personal precautions, protective equipment and emergency procedures. Use personal protective equipment. Avoid dust formation. Avoid breathing vapors, mist or gas. Ensure adequate ventilation. Avoid breathing dust; Environmental precautions: Prevent further leakage or spillage if safe to do so. Do not let product enter drains. Discharge into the environment must be avoided; Methods and materials for containment and cleaning up: Pick up and arrange disposal without creating dust. Sweep up and shovel. Keep in suitable, closed containers for disposal.
SRP: Recycle any unused portion of the material for its approved use or return it to the manufacturer or supplier. Ultimate disposal of the chemical must consider: the material's impact on air quality; potential migration in air, soil or water; effects on animal, aquatic and plant life; and conformance with environmental and public health regulations. If it is possible or reasonable use an alternative chemical product with less inherent propensity for occupational harm/injury/toxicity or environmental contamination.
Product: Offer surplus and non-recyclable solutions to a licensed disposal company. Contact a licensed professional waste disposal service to dispose of this material. Contaminated packaging: Dispose of as unused product.
Precautions for safe handling: Avoid contact with skin and eyes. Avoid formation of dust and aerosols. Further processing of solid materials may result in the formation of combustible dusts. The potential for combustible dust formation should be taken into consideration before additional processing occurs. Provide appropriate exhaust ventilation at places where dust is formed.
Appropriate engineering controls: Handle in accordance with good industrial hygiene and safety practice. Wash hands before breaks and at the end of workday.
Gloves must be inspected prior to use. Use proper glove removal technique (without touching glove's outer surface) to avoid skin contact with this product. Dispose of contaminated gloves after use in accordance with applicable laws and good laboratory practices. Wash and dry hands.
SRP: Local exhaust ventilation should be applied wherever there is an incidence of point source emissions or dispersion of regulated contaminants in the work area. Ventilation control of the contaminant as close to its point of generation is both the most economical and safest method to minimize personnel exposure to airborne contaminants. Ensure that the local ventilation moves the contaminant away from the worker.
SRP: The scientific literature for the use of contact lenses by industrial workers is inconsistent. The benefits or detrimental effects of wearing contact lenses depend not only upon the substance, but also on factors including the form of the substance, characteristics and duration of the exposure, the uses of other eye protection equipment, and the hygiene of the lenses. However, there may be individual substances whose irritating or corrosive properties are such that the wearing of contact lenses would be harmful to the eye. In those specific cases, contact lenses should not be worn. In any event, the usual eye protection equipment should be worn even when contact lenses are in place.
Eye/face protection: Safety glasses with side-shields conforming to EN166. Use equipment for eye protection tested and approved under appropriate government standards such as NIOSH (US) or EN 166(EU).
Skin protection: Handle with gloves.
Body Protection: Impervious clothing. The type of protective equipment must be selected according to the concentration and amount of the dangerous substance at the specific workplace.
Respiratory protection: For nuisance exposures use type P95 (US) or type P1 (EU EN 143) particle respirator. For higher level protection use type OV/AG/P99 (US) or type ABEK-P2 (EU EN 143) respirator cartridges. Use respirators and components tested and approved under appropriate government standards such as NIOSH (US) or CEN (EU).
TERRESTRIAL FATE: Based on a classification scheme(1), an estimated Koc value of 36(SRC), determined from a structure estimation method(2), indicates that ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate is expected to have very high mobility in soil(SRC). Volatilization of ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate from moist soil surfaces is not expected to be an important fate process(SRC) given an estimated Henry's Law constant of 4.6X10-9 atm-cu m/mole(SRC), based upon its vapor pressure, 1.1X10-3 mm Hg(3), and water solubility, 7.0X10+4 mg/L(3). Ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate is not expected to volatilize from dry soil surfaces(SRC) based upon its vapor pressure(3). Biodegradation data in soil were not available(SRC, 2016).
AQUATIC FATE: Based on a classification scheme(1), an estimated Koc value of 36(SRC), determined from a structure estimation method(2), indicates that ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate is not expected to adsorb to suspended solids and sediment(SRC). Volatilization from water surfaces is not expected(3), based upon an estimated Henry's Law constant of 4.6X10-9 atm-cu m/mole(SRC), derived from its vapor pressure, 1.1X10-3 mm Hg(4), and water solubility, 7.0X10+4 mg/L(4). Ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate is not expected to undergo hydrolysis; estimated hydrolysis half-lives of 3.8 years and 140 days at pH values of 7 and 8, respectively, were calculated(2). According to a classification scheme(5), an estimated BCF of 6(SRC), from its log Kow of 1.7(4) and a regression-derived equation(2), suggests the potential for bioconcentration in aquatic organisms is low(SRC). Biodegradation data in water were not available(SRC, 2016).
ATMOSPHERIC FATE: According to a model of gas/particle partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds in the atmosphere(1), ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate, which has a vapor pressure of 1.1X10-3 mm Hg at 20 °C(2), is expected to exist solely as a vapor in the ambient atmosphere. Vapor-phase ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate is degraded in the atmosphere by reaction with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals(SRC); the half-life for this reaction in air is estimated to be 13 hours(SRC), calculated from its rate constant of 2.9X10-11 cu cm/molecule-sec at 25 °C(SRC) that was derived using a structure estimation method(3). Ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate contains chromophores that absorb at wavelengths >290 nm(4) and, therefore, may be susceptible to direct photolysis by sunlight(SRC).
IDENTIFICATION AND USE: EBAAP is a colorless to slightly yellowish liquid. It is an insect repellent for application to human skin and clothing to repel mosquitoes, flies and ticks. It provides high level of protection for at least 8 hr against Ae. albopictus and for at least 5 hr against C. gelidus, C. tritaeniorhynchus, C. quinquefasciatus, Mansonia dives, M. uniformis, M. annulata, M. annulifera, Anopheles minimus, and An. maculatus. This clearly documents the potential for its use as a topical treatment against a wide range of mosquito species belonging to several genera. HUMAN EXPOSURE AND TOXICITY: Closed epicutaneous irritation test using 15% a.i. was performed in 30 human volunteers. No skin reactions were observed. Repetitive exposure test using 15% a.i. was performed in 10 human volunteers 3 wk at twice/wk (induction phase); 12 d break; then 7th application (challenge). No toxic or allergic reactions were observed. ANIMAL STUDIES: 10% solution in ethanol was applied to shaven nuchal area of 10 guinea pigs. No erythema or edema observed at UV-exposed and unexposed sites. Undiluted EBAAP was applied to shaven dorsal skin (6 hr exposure; recovery period 14 d) of rats. Up to 10 mL/kg bw no systemic reactions observed; erythemas at all dose levels. Mongrel dogs were given undiluted EBAAP by gavage at 1, 2, 4 and 8 g/kg bw. All animals survived; doses of 2 g/kg bw or more induced vomiting after 30-60 minutes followed by salivation after 20-30 minutes. EBAAP was administered orally by gavage at a dose of 999 mg/kg/day to female rabbits. Blood pressure was lower for the 2 treated animals than for the 2 control animals (determined after 8 days of treatment). Various serum chemistry parameters were affected by the treatment. Histopathological evaluation of the treated animals revealed hemorrhages and erosions in the gastric mucosa and intestinal tract, vacuolar degeneration of parenchymal cells and hemosiderosis in the liver, deposition of protein in the Bowman's space of the kidney. Atrophy of the bone marrow was also noted for one rabbit. Artificially inseminated female rabbits were treated orally by gavage with 0 100, 300, or 600 mg/kg/day of EBAAP from day 7 through day 19 of gestation. No treatment-related effects on the does were evident. Likewise, no treatment-related effects were noted on development of the fetuses. S. typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA 1535, and TA 1537 and E. coli WP2 uvrA were treated for 48 hours at 37 °C with EBAAP at concentrations ranging from 5 to 5000 ug/plate with and without metabolic activation. There was no treatment-related increase in the incidence of reverse mutation. ECOTOXICITY STUDIES: No evidences for disruption of the chemical communication of fish and Daphnia by EBAAP were found.
/AQUATIC SPECIES/ Commercial insect repellents like DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide), EBAAP (IR3535, (3-[N-butyl-N-acetyl]-aminopropionic acid, ethyl ester)) or Icaridine (picaridin, Bayrepel, 1-piperidinecarboxylic acid, 2-(2-hydroxyethyl), 1-methylpropyl ester) are used worldwide to protect against biting insects and ticks. The detection of these repellents in surface waters in concentrations up to several ug/L levels has caused concern that these substances might affect non-target organisms in freshwaters. Daphnia sp., a keystone organism in lakes and ponds, is known for diel vertical migration (DVM) and life-history changes (LHCs) as inducible defenses against predation by fish. ...Whether (i) environmentally relevant concentrations of DEET, EBAPP or Icaridine have repellent effects on Daphnia magna and (ii) if these repellents are infodisruptors for DVM and LHCs /was tested/. Using concentrations of up to 44 ug/L, the repellents neither had effects on juvenile somatic growth nor on clutch size. In thermally stratified water columns with a repellent-free hypolimnion, no repellent effects of the test compounds on D. magna were observed. The presence of fish-borne infochemicals induced LHCs, which are characterized by a reduced size at first reproduction, and DVM in D. magna. These effects were not affected by the presence of either repellent. Hence no evidences for infodisruption of the chemical communication of fish and Daphnia by DEET, EBAAP or Icaridine were found.
EPA has released the Interactive Chemical Safety for Sustainability (iCSS) Dashboard. The iCSS Dashboard provides an interactive tool to explore rapid, automated (or in vitro high-throughput) chemical screening data generated by the Toxicity Forecaster (ToxCast) project and the federal Toxicity Testing in the 21st century (Tox21) collaboration. /The title compound was tested by ToxCast and/or Tox21 assays/[USEPA; ICSS Dashboard Application; Available from, as of July 7, 2016: http://actor.epa.gov/dashboard/]
Using a structure estimation method based on molecular connectivity indices(1), the Koc of ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate can be estimated to be 36(SRC). According to a classification scheme(2), this estimated Koc value suggests that ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate is expected to have very high mobility in soil.
/HUMAN EXPOSURE STUDIES/ Closed epicutaneous irritation test using 15% a.i. /IR3535/ in aqueous alcohol /was performed in 30 human volunteers. No skin reactions were observed. /From table/
/HUMAN EXPOSURE STUDIES/ Repetitive exposure test using 15% a.i. /IR3535/ in aqueous alcohol /was performed/ in 10 human volunteers 3 wk at twice/wk (induction phase); 12 d break; then 7th application (challenge). No toxic or allergic reactions /were observed/. /From table/
An estimated BCF of 6 was calculated in fish for ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate(SRC), using a log Kow of 1.7(1) and a regression-derived equation(2). According to a classification scheme(2), this BCF suggests the potential for bioconcentration in aquatic organisms is low(SRC).
The Henry's Law constant for ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate is estimated as 4.6X10-9 atm-cu m/mole(SRC) derived from its vapor pressure, 1.1X10-3 mm Hg(1), and water solubility, 7.0X10+4 mg/L(1). This Henry's Law constant indicates that ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate is expected to be essentially nonvolatile from water and moist soil surfaces(2). Ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate is not expected to volatilize from dry soil surfaces(SRC) based upon its vapor pressure(1).
/LABORATORY ANIMALS: Acute Exposure/ 10% /IR3535/ solution in ethanol /was/ applied to shaven nuchal area of 10 Himalayan white spotted albino guinea pigs. No erythema or edema observed at UV-exposed and unexposed sites. /From table/
/LABORATORY ANIMALS: Acute Exposure/ Mongrel dogs (1 male, 1 female per dose group) /were given/ undiluted /IR3535/ by gavage at 1, 2, 4 and 8 g/kg bw followed by 10 mL water. All animals survived; doses of 2 g/kg bw or more induced vomiting after 30-60 minutes followed by salivation after 20-30 minutes. /From table/
/LABORATORY ANIMALS: Acute Exposure/ Undiluted /IR3535 was/ applied to shaven dorsal skin (6 hr exposure; recovery period 14 d) of Sprague-Dawley rats (5 males, 5 females per dose level); doses 6.35, 7.9, 10.00 mL/kg. Up to 10 mL/kg bw no systemic reactions observed; erythemas at all dose levels, one rat had an erythema of grade 2. /From table/
/LABORATORY ANIMALS: Acute Exposure/ Undiluted /IR3535 was/ applied to shaven dorsal skin (6 hr exposure; recovery period 14 d) beagle dogs (1 male, 1 female per dose level); doses 6.35, 7.9, 10.00 mL/kg. Up to 10 mL/kg bw no systemic reactions observed; local erythemas observed at all doses. /From table/
For more Non-Human Toxicity Excerpts (Complete) data for Ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate (21 total), please visit the HSDB record page.
The rate constant for the vapor-phase reaction of ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals has been estimated as 2.9X10-11 cu cm/molecule-sec at 25 °C(SRC) using a structure estimation method(1). This corresponds to an atmospheric half-life of about 13 hours at an atmospheric concentration of 5X10+5 hydroxyl radicals per cu cm(1). A base-catalyzed second-order hydrolysis rate constant of 0.058 L/mole-sec(SRC) was estimated using a structure estimation method(1); this corresponds to half-lives of 3.8 years and 140 days at pH values of 7 and 8, respectively(1). Ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate contains chromophores that absorb at wavelengths >290 nm(2) and, therefore, may be susceptible to direct photolysis by sunlight(SRC).
Occupational exposure to ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate may occur through inhalation and dermal contact with this compound at workplaces where ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate is produced or used. Use data indicate that the general population may be exposed to ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate via inhalation of mist and dermal contact with consumer products containing ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate. (SRC)
The insect repellents 3535 (ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate or IR3535) and deet (N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide) were prepared as 20% solutions in absolute ethanol and evaluated for repellency against many mosquito species in Thailand under laboratory and field conditions using human subjects. In the laboratory, 0.1 mL was applied per 30-sq cm of exposed area on a volunteer's forearm (0.66-0.67 mg active ingredient [AI]/sq cm), whereas in the field, volunteers' legs (from knee to ankle, with a surface area of about 712-782 sq cm) were treated with 3 mL per exposed area (0.76-0.84 mg AI/sq cm). In the laboratory, both IR3535 and deet showed equal repellency (P > 0.05) for 9.8 and 9.7 hr against Aedes aegypti, for 13.7 and 12.7 hr against Culex quinquefasciatus, and for 14.8 and 14.5 hr against C. tritaeniorhynchus, respectively. Anopheles dirus was significantly less sensitive to IR3535 than to deet (P < 0.05), with a mean protection time of 3.8 and 5.8 hr, respectively. Under field conditions, both IR3535 and deet provided a high degree of protection against various mosquito vectors ranging from 94 to 100% during the test periods. Both repellents provided a high level of protection for at least 8 hr against Ae. albopictus and for at least 5 hr against C. gelidus, C. tritaeniorhynchus, C. quinquefasciatus, Mansonia dives, M. uniformis, M. annulata, M. annulifera, Anopheles minimus, and An. maculatus. This study clearly documents the potential of IR3535 for use as a topical treatment against a wide range of mosquito species belonging to several genera.
BeschreibungEthyl butylacetylaminopropionate (IR3535) is effective against several insects and is considered an alternative repellent to DEET and Icaridin, thanks to its very low toxicity and equal efficacy. Officially considered safe and effective for use in children over 2 months of age and pregnant and breastfeeding women by the World Health Organization, this repellent has been used in Europe for over 30 years, and its use has been increasing worldwide[1].
HistoryEthyl butylacetylaminopropionate is a synthetic molecule derived from a natural amino acid, b-alanine, and its alternative chemical formula name is beta-alanine, n-acetyl-N-butyl-ethyl ester. It is known as IR3535 or EBAAP in the literature. This molecule was developed in the early 1970s using targeted molecular design following functional structure guidelines similar to those reported by Boeckh.1 In his study, repellency of a chemical was correlated with a structural pattern consisting of an amide group linked by a lipophilic chain to an sp3 (i.e., an oxygen atom without a double bond) hybridized oxygen within a group such as hydroxyl or ester. IR3535 repellent (hereafter referred to as IR3535) is currently used in over 150 consumer products world-wide. Despite its commercial history of more than 10 years world-wide and 25 years in European countries, IR3535 has been introduced as a product in the U.S. only recently (1999).
VerwendenEthyl Butylacetylaminopropionate is an insect repellent for application to human skin and clothing in public health applications, to repel biting arthropods such as mosquitoes, flies and ticks.
DefinitionChEBI: Ethyl 3-(N-butylacetamido)propionate is a tertiary carboxamide, a member of acetamides and an ethyl ester.