Back
HuagongsheHuagongshe Chemistry Print Report · For research reference only
HCID 2450Generated: October 23, 2026

Bronopol

2-BROMO-2-NITROPROPANE-1,3-DIOL · 2-BROMO-2-NITRO-1,3-PROPANEDIOL · Bronopol 1g [52-51-7] · Broponol · 2-BroMo-2-nitropropane-1 · 2-Bromo-2-nitro-1,3-propanedio · 2-Bromo-2-nitropropan-1,3-diol · 2-Nitro-2-bromo-1,3-propanediol

https://huagongshe.com/en/chemical/2450

Bronopol molecular structure

Identifiers & Physical Properties

CAS No.52-51-7
Molecular formulaC3H6BrNO4
Average molar mass199.99 g/mol
Monoisotopic mass198.94801977 g/mol
SMILESO=[N+]([O-])C(Br)(CO)CO
InChIKeyLVDKZNITIUWNER-UHFFFAOYSA-N
PubChem CID2450
ChEMBLCHEMBL1408862
ChEBICHEBI:31306
EC No.200-143-0
DTXSIDDTXSID8024652

Chemical & Physical Properties

XLogP-0.6
Topological polar surface area86.3
Hydrogen bond donors2
Hydrogen bond acceptors4
Rotatable bonds2
Heavy atoms9
Formal charge0
Complexity107
Chemical classesOther Uses -> Biocides/Disinfectants
DrugsPharmaceuticals -> Listed in ZINC15
CosmeticsCosmetic ingredients (2-Bromo-2-Nitropropane-1,3-Diol) -> CIR (Cosmetic Ingredient Review)Preservative
PesticidesBactericides, FungicidesActive substance -> EU Pesticides database: Not approved
LogP (partition coefficient)0.18
OdorOdorless
DensityRelative density (water = 1): 1.92.0002 (rough estimate)
Color/FormWhite crystalline powderCrystals from ethyl acetate-chloroform
Solubilitygreater than or equal to 100 mg/mL at 63 °F (NTP, 1992)25-25g/100mL at 22°CIn water, 2.5X10+5 mg/L at 22 °CSoluble in alcohol, ethyl acetate. Slightly soluble in chloroform, acetone, ether, benzene. Insoluble in ligroin.Solubility in water, g/100ml at 23 °C: 28 (freely soluble)H2O: soluble100mg/mL, clear, colorless to faintly yellow25 g/100 mL (22 ºC)
Flash point167 °C167°C
Animal DrugsPharmaceuticals -> UK Veterinary Medicines Directorate List
Boiling point305.1 °F at 760 mmHg (NTP, 1992)358.0±42.0 °C(Predicted)
Melting point130-133 °C(lit.)
Refractive index1.6200 (estimate)
Storage conditionsInert atmosphere,Room Temperature
pKa (acidity coefficient)12.02±0.10(Predicted)
Physical stateCrystals or Crystalline Powder
ColorWhite to yellow
Merck14,1447
BRN1705868
Henry's law constant7.6×105 mol/(m3Pa) at 25℃, HSDB (2015)
StabilityStable. Hygroscopic. Incompatible with strong oxidizing agents, strong bases, strong reducing agents, acid chlorides and anhydrides, moisture.
Major applicationsagriculturecleaning productscosmeticsenvironmentalfood and beveragespersonal care
Cosmetics Ingredients FunctionsPRESERVATIVE
Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR)Bronopol (52-51-7)
InChI1S/C3H6BrNO4/c4-3(1-6,2-7)5(8)9/h6-7H,1-2H2
InChIKeyLVDKZNITIUWNER-UHFFFAOYSA-N
SMILESOCC(Br)(CO)[N+]([O-])=O
LogP (partition coefficient)1.150 (est)
CAS DataBase Reference52-51-7(CAS DataBase Reference)
Indirect Additives used in Food Contact Substances2-BROMO-2-NITRO-1,3-PROPANEDIOL
FDA 21 CFR175.105176.170176.300
FDA UNII6PU1E16C9W
NIST Chemistry ReferenceBronopol(52-51-7)
Pesticides Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)Bronopol
EPA Substance Registry SystemBronopol (52-51-7)
UNSPSC Code41116107
NACRESNA.24
GHS pictogramGHS05,GHS07,GHS09
Signal wordDanger
GHS hazard statementsH302+H312-H315-H318-H335-H410
GHS precautionary statementsP261-P273-P280-P301+P312-P302+P352+P312-P305+P351+P338
Target organsRespiratory system
Personal protective equipment (PPE)dust mask type N95 (US), Eyeshields, Faceshields, Gloves
Hazard symbolsXn,N
Risk statements (R)21/22-37/38-41-50
Safety statements (S)26-37/39-61-36/37/39
UN transport numberUN 3241
Water hazard class (WGK)2
RTECS numberTY3385000
F4.2-8-9-21
TSCA inventory statusTSCA listed
Hazard class4.1Acute Tox. 4 DermalAcute Tox. 4 OralAquatic Acute 1Aquatic Chronic 1Eye Dam. 1Skin Irrit. 2STOT SE 3
Packing groupIII
Customs code29055999
Storage class4.1B - Flammable solid hazardous materials
Hazardous substances data52-51-7(Hazardous Substances Data)
ToxicityLD50 in mice, rats (mg/kg): 350, 400 orally (Croshaw)
REACH registrationsActive
Limited quantities5.0 Kg (11 lbs) (solid)
Excepted quantitiesMax Inner Pack (30g or 30ml) and Max Outer Pack (1Kg or 1L)

Safety & Regulations

GHS classificationDangerH302: Harmful if swallowed [Warning Acute toxicity, oral]P261, P264, P264+P265, P270, P271, P273, P280, P301+P317, P302+P352, P304+P340, P305+P354+P338, P317, P319, P321, P330, P332+P317, P362+P364, P391, P403+P233, P405, and P501 (click each P-code to see the statement)This chemical does not meet GHS hazard criteria for < 0.1% (1 of 2149) of reports.H301 (14.4%): Toxic if swallowed [Danger Acute toxicity, oral]
Regulatory informationChemical: 1,3-Propanediol, 2-bromo-2-nitro-1,3-Propanediol, 2-bromo-2-nitro- is listed on the EPA's Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) system. Manufacturers and importers of 1,3-Propanediol, 2-bromo-2-nitro- are required to report information about their production and use of this chemical to the EPA under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). (40 eCFR Part 711)2002/2076Status: Active Update: 01-12-2022 https://echa.europa.eu/registration-dossier/-/registered-dossier/11419Bronopol: HSNO Approval: HSR003563 Approved with controls
Other safety informationIMAP assessments - 1,3-Propanediol, 2-bromo-2-nitro-: Human health tier II assessment
DOT labelFlammable Solid
Fire hazardsExcerpt from ERG Guide 133 [Flammable Solids]:· Flammable/combustible material.Flammable. Gives off irritating or toxic fumes (or gases) in a fire. Finely dispersed particles form explosive mixtures in air.
Fire potentialCombustible.
Health hazardsExcerpt from ERG Guide 133 [Flammable Solids]:· Fire may produce irritating and/or toxic gases.
Hazards summaryBronopol is a skin sensitizer. Cosmetic preparations contain concentrations of 0.01% to 0.02%. Significant irritant effects are seen when the concentration reaches 1% or greater. [Marks, p. 136-7] Skin sensitization reported in dairy workers and a veterinarian using a gel for ultrasound examinations[Kanerva, p. 1762] A skin, eye, and respiratory tract irritantA skin sensitizer[ICSC]
DOT ID and guide3241 133
FDA requirements2-Bromo-2-nitro-1,3-propanediol is an indirect food additive for use only as a component of adhesives. Limit: For use only as an antibacterial preservative.
Reactive groupAlcohols and Polyols
EC classificationSymbol: Xn, NR: 21/22-37/38-41-50S: (2)-26-37/39-61
UN classificationUN Hazard Class: 4.1UN Pack Group: III
Fire fightingExcerpt from ERG Guide 133 [Flammable Solids]:Use water spray, powder, alcohol-resistant foam, carbon dioxide.
First aid measuresFresh air, rest.Remove contaminated clothes. Rinse skin with plenty of water or shower.First rinse with plenty of water for several minutes (remove contact lenses if easily possible), then refer for medical attention.Rinse mouth. Refer for medical attention .
Accidental release measures· CALL 911. Then call emergency response telephone number on shipping paper. If shipping paper not available or no answer, refer to appropriate telephone number listed on the inside back cover.· ELIMINATE all ignition sources (no smoking, flares, sparks or flames) from immediate area.
First aidEYES: First check the victim for contact lenses and remove if present. Flush victim's eyes with water or normal saline solution for 20 to 30 minutes while simultaneously calling a hospital or poison control center. Do not put any ointments, oils, or medication in the victim's eyes without specific instructions from a physician. IMMEDIATELY transport the victim after flushing eyes to a hospital even if no symptoms (such as redness or irritation) develop.General First Aid:
Safe storageFireproof. Separated from food and feedstuffs and incompatible materials. See Chemical Dangers. Dry. Well closed. Keep in a well-ventilated room. Store in an area without drain or sewer access. Provision to contain effluent from fire extinguishing.
Exposure control and personal protection· Wear positive pressure self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA).
Fire fighting proceduresWear self contained breathing apparatus for fire fighting if necessary.Use water spray to cool unopened containers.Suitable extinguishing media: Use water spray, alcohol-resistant foam, dry chemical or carbon dioxide.Powder, alcohol-resistant foam, water spray, carbon dioxide.
Storage conditionsKeep container tightly closed in a dry well-ventilated place.Separated from food and feedstuffs and incompatible materials. Dry. Well closed. Keep in a well-ventilated room.
Cleanup methodsSweep up and shovel. Contain spillage, and then collect with an electrically protected vacuum cleaner or by wet-brushing and place in container for disposal according to local regulations ... Keep in suitable, closed containers for disposal. Contain spillage, pick up with an electrically protected vacuum cleaner or by wet-brushing and transfer to a container for disposal according to local regulations ... .Prevent further leakage or spillage if safe to do so. Do not let product enter drains. Discharge into the environment must be avoided.Wear respiratory protection. Avoid dust formation. Avoid breathing vapors, mist or gas. Ensure adequate ventilation. Evacuate personnel to safe areas. Avoid breathing dust.Sweep spilled substance into containersif appropriate, moisten first to prevent dusting. Carefully collect remainder, then remove to safe place. (Extra personal protection: P2 filter respirator for harmful particles).
Nonfire spill responseExcerpt from ERG Guide 133 [Flammable Solids]:
Disposal methodsSRP: The most favorable course of action is to use an alternative chemical product with less inherent propensity for occupational exposure or environmental contamination. Recycle any unused portion of the material for its approved use or return it to the manufacturer or supplier. Ultimate disposal of the chemical must consider: the material's impact on air qualitypotential migration in soil or watereffects on animal, aquatic, and plant lifeand conformance with environmental and public health regulations.Product: Burn in a chemical incinerator equipped with an afterburner and scrubber but exert extra care in igniting as this material is highly flammable. Offer surplus and non-recyclable solutions to a licensed disposal company. Contact a licensed professional waste disposal service to dispose of this material.Contaminated packaging: Dispose of as unused product.
Spillage disposalPersonal protection: particulate filter respirator adapted to the airborne concentration of the substance. Do NOT let this chemical enter the environment. Sweep spilled substance into covered containers. If appropriate, moisten first to prevent dusting. Carefully collect remainder. Then store and dispose of according to local regulations.
TreatmentEYES: irrigate opened eyes for several minutes under running water. INGESTION: do not induce vomiting. Rinse mouth with water (never give anything by mouth to an unconscious person). Seek immediate medical advice. SKIN: should be treated immediately by rinsing the affected parts in cold running water for at least 15 minutes, followed by thorough washing with soap and water. If necessary, the person should shower and change contaminated clothing and shoes, and then must seek medical attention. INHALATION: supply fresh air. If required provide artificial respiration.
Health effectsBronopol may react to produce nitrosamines, which are believed to be carcinogenic. It also releases formaldehyde, a known human carcinogen. (L962, A2881)
Ecotoxicity valuesLD50Species: Anas platyrhynchos (Mallard duck) oral 509.5 mg/kg /99.4% a.i./ /from table/LC50Species: Anas platyrhynchos (Mallard duck) oral >10,000 ppm /in the diet/ for 8 days /100% a.i./ /from table/Species: Colinus virginianus (Northern bobwhite) oral 4487.6 ppm /in the diet/ /8 days /100% a.i./ /from table/Species: Oncorhynchus mykiss (Rainbow trout)Conditions: flow throughConcentration: 41.6 ppm for 96 hr (95% confidence interval: 36-45 ppm) /100% a.i./ /from table/For more Ecotoxicity Values (Complete) data for BRONOPOL (9 total), please visit the HSDB record page.
Environmental fateTERRESTRIAL FATE: Based on a classification scheme(1), an estimated Koc value of 1(SRC), determined from a structure estimation method(2), indicates that bronopol is expected to have very high mobility in soil(SRC). Volatilization of bronopol from moist soil surfaces is not expected to be an important fate process(SRC) given an estimated Henry's Law constant of 1.3X10-11 atm-cu m/mole(SRC), based upon its vapor pressure, 1.26X10-5 mm Hg(3), and water solubility, 2.5X10+5 mg/L(4). Bronopol is not expected to volatilize from dry soil surfaces(SRC) based upon its vapor pressure(3). A 0% of theoretical BOD using activated sludge in the Japanese MITI test(5) suggests that biodegradation is not an important environmental fate process in soil(SRC).AQUATIC FATE: Based on a classification scheme(1), an estimated Koc value of 1(SRC), determined from a structure estimation method(2), indicates that bronopol is not expected to adsorb to suspended solids and sediment(SRC). Volatilization from water surfaces is not expected(3) based upon an estimated Henry's Law constant of 1.3X10-11 atm-cu m/mole(SRC), derived from its vapor pressure, 1.26X10-5 mm Hg(4), and water solubility, 2.5X10+5 mg/L(5). Bronopol is stable to hydrolysis under normal environmental conditions. At 20 °C, the hydrolysis half-life was extrapolated to be about 18 years at pH 4, about 1.5 years at pH 6, and approximately 2 months at pH 8(6). Bronopol rapidly photodegrades at pH 4 exhibiting a photolysis half-life of 24 hours in water(6). According to a classification scheme(7), an estimated BCF of 1(SRC), from an estimated log Kow of -0.64(2) and a regression-derived equation(2), suggests the potential for bioconcentration in aquatic organisms is low(SRC). Bronopol was not biodegraded using a mixed culture sewage sludge test(8)therefore, biodegradation is not expected to be an important fate process in the aquatic environment(SRC).ATMOSPHERIC FATE: According to a model of gas/particle partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds in the atmosphere(1), bronopol, which has a vapor pressure of 1.26X10-5 mm Hg at 20 °C(2), is expected to exist in both the vapor and particulate phases in the ambient atmosphere. Vapor-phase bronopol is degraded in the atmosphere by reaction with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals(SRC)the half-life for this reaction in air is estimated to be 11 days(SRC), calculated from its rate constant of 1.3X10-12 cu cm/molecule-sec at 25 °C(SRC) that was derived using a structure estimation method(2). Particulate-phase bronopol may be removed from the air by wet and dry deposition(SRC). Bronopol rapidly photodegrades at pH 4 exhibiting a photolysis half-life of 24 hours in waterunder natural sunlight, a photolysis half-life of 2 days is expected(3). Therefore, bronopol may be susceptible to direct photolysis(SRC).
Adverse effectsSkin Sensitizer - An agent that can induce an allergic reaction in the skin.
Exposure routesThe substance can be absorbed into the body by inhalation of its aerosol, through the skin and by ingestion.Oral (A2881)inhalation (A2881)dermal (A2881)
Toxicity summaryThe evidence at hand indicates 2-Bromo-2-Nitropropane-1,3-Diol to be safe as a cosmetic ingredient at concentrations up to and including 0.1 percent except under circumstances where its action with amines or amides can result in the formation of nitrosamines or nitrosamides.Safe for use in cosmetics, with qualificationsWhile Bronopol is not in itself a nitrosating agent, under conditions where it decomposes (alkaline solution and/or elevated temperatures) it can liberate nitrite and low levels of formaldehyde. These decomposition products can react with any secondary amines or amides (which may contaminate cosmetic products) to produce significant levels of nitrosamines, which are believed to be carcinogenic. Once in the body, nitrosamines are activated by cytochrome P-450 enzymes. They are then believed to induce their carcinogenic effects by forming DNA adducts at the N- and O-atoms. Formaldehyde itself is also carcinogenic. It is likely that formaldehyde toxicity occurs when intracellular levels saturate formaldehyde dehydrogenase activity, allowing the unmetabolized intact molecule to exert its effects. Formaldehyde is known to form cross links between protein and DNA and undergo metabolic incorporation into macromolecules (DNA, RNA, and proteins). (L962, L643, L1889, A2878, A2879, A2880, A2881, L1893)
Signs and SymptomsCough. Sore throat.Redness.Redness. Stinging sensation. Pain. Burns.Sore throat. Tingling sensation.
Ongoing Test StatusEPA has released the first beta version (version 0.5) of the Interactive Chemical Safety for Sustainability (iCSS) Dashboard. The beta version of the iCSS Dashboard provides an interactive tool to explore rapid, automated (or in vitro high-throughput) chemical screening data generated by the Toxicity Forecaster (ToxCast) project and the federal Toxicity Testing in the 21st century (Tox21) collaboration. /The title compound was tested by ToxCast and/or Tox21 assaysSee the data in Chemical Explorer/[USEPAICSS Dashboard ApplicationAvailable from, as of March 28, 2014: http://actor.epa.gov/dashboard/]The following link will take the user to the National Toxicology Program (NTP) Test Agent Search Results page, which tabulates all of the "Standard Toxicology & Carcinogenesis Studies", "Developmental Studies", and "Genetic Toxicity Studies" performed with this chemical. Clicking on the "Testing Status" link will take the user to the status (i.e., in review, in progress, in preparation, on test, completed, etc.) and results of all the studies that the NTP has done on this chemical.[Available from, as of February 24, 2014: http://ntp-apps.niehs.nih.gov/ntp_tox/index.cfm?fuseaction=ntpsearch.searchresults&searchterm=52-51-7]
ICSC Environmental DataThe substance is very toxic to aquatic organisms. The substance may cause long-term effects in the aquatic environment.
Soil Adsorption/MobilityUsing a structure estimation method based on molecular connectivity indices(1), the Koc of bronopol can be estimated to be 1(SRC). According to a classification scheme(2), this estimated Koc value suggests that bronopol is expected to have very high mobility in soil.
Human Toxicity Excerpts/HUMAN EXPOSURE STUDIES/ A total of 8149 patients were patch tested with the preservative Bronopol in 7 European contact clinics. The majority of patients were investigated in London. Reactivity was low, with a total of 10 irritant (0.12%) and 38 allergic reactions (0.47%). In only 17 cases (0.21%) was the patch test reaction to Bronopol considered to be of current or past clinical relevance. ...Based on these figures, the present sensitization rate to Bronopol in Europe seems to be quite low, which may be related to its less frequent use as a preservative in cosmetics and medicaments in comparison to parabens or isothiazolinones./CASE REPORTS/ Six cases of contact allergy to bronopol are described (5 females, 1 malemean age, 60.8 years). Four patients suffered from stasis dermatitis of the lower leg. The cause of sensitization has been traced to bronopol-containing ointments in 5 of 6 cases. For patch testing 0.25% bronopol in petrolatum is recommended. One-third of the patients were also sensitized to formaldehyde, which is a degradation product of bronopol./CASE REPORTS/ Two cases of allergic dermatitis caused by occupational exposure to cosmetic creams were summarized. Two males, 25 and 54 years old, who were employed as perfume and cosmetic component formulators at a Polish cosmetics factory were evaluated for hand and arm dermatitis. The patients reported that their dermatitis tended to clear during short absences from work and on holidays. The 25 year old patient reported that a soap that he used during a holiday exacerbated his symptoms. The patients were patch tested with the Polish standard allergen series, a preservative series, workplace allergens, and Bronopol, a commercial preparation containing bromonitropropanediol. ... Both patients reported that their jobs involved weighing 36 grams to 0.1 kilogram Bronopol daily. Their dermatitis developed a few weeks after Bronopol from a new supplier was introduced. The patients changed to jobs that did not involve contact with cosmetic components. Their dermatoses cleared and had not recurred when examined 6 and 9 months later./CASE REPORTS/ A case of allergic contact dermatitis in a veterinary surgeon was described. A 35 year old male veterinary surgeon developed a painful erythematous swelling on his left arm extending from the fingers to the mid upper arm. He stated that he had abraded his arm at work 2 weeks previously. Because he was employed as an equine gynecologist the cause of the inflammation was thought to be cellulitis. He was treated with oral penicillin and flucloxacillin and his arm was elevated in a sling. With his left arm immobilized he had to use his right arm at work. He returned 4 days later with the erythematous swelling now present on the right arm. The swelling on both arms was treated as contact dermatitis with corticosteroids and emollients. Further inquiry about his occupation revealed that he practiced as a specialist stud farm veterinarian and he spent much of his time performing ultrasonic examinations through the rectum of thoroughbred mares to assess the state of the ovaries and pregnancy. This required a full arm rectal examination. Shortly before his left arm became swollen, he had started using a new lubricant jelly, Vet-Lubrigel. He was advised to use an alternative lubricant. His arms improved rapidly after he switched to the new lubricant. Subsequent patch testing showed that he was allergic to both Vet-Lubrigel and its preservative Bronopol./ALTERNATIVE and IN VITRO TESTS/ Formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers are widely used preservatives and represent an important group of skin sensitizers. Formaldehyde is very often suspected to be the sensitizing agent of formaldehyde-releasershowever, many reported clinical cases of contact allergy to these molecules such as bronopol (2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol) indicate negative skin reactions to formaldehyde suggesting a more complex mechanism. The aim of this study was to compare the chemical reactivity and biological activity of formaldehyde with those of two formaldehyde releasers: 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol and 1,3-dimethylol-5,5-dimethylhydantoin. A key step in the sensitization to chemicals is the formation of the hapten-protein antigenic complex via covalent binding between the chemical sensitizer and amino acids in proteins. The chemical reactivity of the three compounds was thus addressed using (13)C NMR analysis of adduct formation upon incubation with a set of nucleophilic amino acids. The biological activity was measured in two in vitro models based on dendritic cells and a monocytic cell line (CD34-DC and THP-1 model) through monitoring of a panel of biomarkers. The results obtained show that 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol produces low amount of free formaldehyde in physiological buffers but that its degradation generates various molecules including 2-bromoethanol. In addition, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol also generates adducts with amino acids, not observed with formaldehyde alone, that could be explained by the reactivity of 2-bromoethanol. In parallel, in a cellular approach using the human monocytic THP-1 cell line, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol activates THP-1 cells at concentrations that are not correlated to simple formaldehyde release. This observation is confirmed in the more physiological model CD34-DC. Moreover, in the THP-1 model, the expression profiles of several biomarkers are specific to 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol. Finally, the use in the cellular model of the pure degradation products identified by NMR reveals the reactivity of bromonitromethane. In contrast, 1,3-dimethylol-5,5-dimethylhydantoin presents chemical and biological reactivities similar to those of formaldehyde. Taken together, these data suggest that 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol is an atypical formaldehyde releaser, releasing low amounts of formaldehyde at physiological conditions but producing multiple degradation products among which 2-bromoethanol and bromonitromethane are potential candidates for explaining the specific allergic reactions to 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol.
FIFRA requirementsResidues of 2-ethyl-1-hexanol are exempted from the requirement of a tolerance when used in accordance with good agricultural practice as inert (or occasionally active) ingredients in pesticide formulations applied to growing crops or to raw agricultural commodities after harvest. Use: In-can preservative. Limit: 0.04% or less by weight of the total pesticide formulation.Residues of 2-ethyl-1-hexanol are exempted from the requirement of a tolerance when used in accordance with good agricultural practice as inert (or occasionally active) ingredients in pesticide formulations applied to animals. Use: In-can preservative. Limit: 0.04% or less by weight of the total pesticide formulation.Based on the reviews of the generic data for the active ingredient bronopol, the Agency has sufficient information on the health effects of bronopol and on its potential for causing adverse effects in fish, wildlife and the environment. The Agency has determined that bronopol products, labeled and used as specified in this Reregistration Eligibility Decision document, will not pose unreasonable risks to humans or the environment as long as label restrictions prescribed in this RED are followed. Therefore, the Agency concludes that products containing bronopol for all currently registered uses are eligible for reregistration.As the federal pesticide law FIFRA directs, EPA is conducting a comprehensive review of older pesticides to consider their health and environmental effects and make decisions about their continued use. Under this pesticide reregistration program, EPA examines newer health and safety data for pesticide active ingredients initially registered before November 1, 1984, and determines whether the use of the pesticide does not pose unreasonable risk in accordance to newer saftey standards, such as those described in the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996. Pesticides for which EPA had not issued Registration Standards prior to the effective date of FIFRA '88 were divided into three lists based upon their potential for human exposure and other factors, with List B containing pesticides of greater concern than those on List C, and with List C containing pesticides of greater concern than those on List D. Bronopol is found on List B. Case No: 2770Pesticide type: herbicide, antimicrobialCase Status: RED Approved 09/1995OPP has made a decision that some/all uses of the pesticide are eligible for reregistration, as reflected in a Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) document.Active ingredient (AI): 2-bronopolData Call-in (DCI) Date(s): 06/14/1991, 08/18/1995AI Status: OPP has completed a Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for the case/AI.
F4.2-8-9-21
Personal protective equipment (PPE)dust mask type N95 (US), Eyeshields, Faceshields, Gloves
Water hazard class (WGK)2
TSCA inventory statusTSCA listed
RTECS numberTY3385000
UN transport numberUN 3241
Customs code29055999
ToxicityLD50 in mice, rats (mg/kg): 350, 400 orally (Croshaw)
Risk statements (R)21/22-37/38-41-50
Signal wordDanger
GHS pictogramGHS05,GHS07,GHS09
Hazard symbolsXn,N
Safety statements (S)26-37/39-61-36/37/39
Hazard class4.1Acute Tox. 4 DermalAcute Tox. 4 OralAquatic Acute 1Aquatic Chronic 1Eye Dam. 1Skin Irrit. 2STOT SE 3
Storage class4.1B - Flammable solid hazardous materials
Packing groupIII
Target organsRespiratory system
GHS hazard statementsH302+H312-H315-H318-H335-H410
Limited quantities5.0 Kg (11 lbs) (solid)
Excepted quantitiesMax Inner Pack (30g or 30ml) and Max Outer Pack (1Kg or 1L)
REACH registrationsActive
GHS precautionary statementsP261-P273-P280-P301+P312-P302+P352+P312-P305+P351+P338
Hazardous substances data52-51-7(Hazardous Substances Data)

Applications & Uses

Description

Bronopol, a formaldehyde releaser, was reported as an allergen in dairy workers. In a recent case report, bronopol was contained in a lubricant jelly used for ultrasound examination and caused contact dermatitis in a veterinary surgeon.

Uses

First synthesized in 1897, bronopol was primarily used as an effective preservative agent and possesses a wide spectrum of antibacterial activity and inhibits the growth of fungi and yeasts. It can be used in the formulation of a wide variety of cosmetic and personal care products, especially in leave-on and rinse-off shampoos, creams, lotions, rinses and eye makeup to protect the product integrity by preventing or slowing bacterial growth.Bronopol is used as a microbiocide/microbiostat in oil field systems, air washer systems, air conditioning/humidifying systems, cooling water systems, papermills, absorbent clays, metal working fluids, printing inks, paints, adhesives and consumer/institutional products. A formulating technical material is also registered.https://www.ulprospector.comhttps://www3.epa.gov

Uses

Bronopol has been used as reference standard in ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (UPLC-ICP-MS) method for determination of bromine containing preservatives from cosmetic products.

General Description

White crystals. Ignite easily and burn readily. May detonate under strong shock. Decomposes when heated, evolving toxic gases. Toxic by skin absorption, inhalation or ingestion.