Back
HuagongsheHuagongshe Chemistry Print Report · For research reference only
HRID 35152Generated: October 26, 2026

Methyl Methacrylate → Butyl prop-2-enoate--methyl 2-methylprop-2-enoate (1/1)

https://huagongshe.com/reaction/35152

Reaction equation

Participants

RoleNameHCIDCharge
ReactantMethyl MethacrylateHCID 6658—
ReactantButyl AcrylateHCID 8846—
ReactantSodium CarbonateHCID 10340—
SolventNitric AcidHCID 944—
SolventWaterHCID 962—
ProductButyl prop-2-enoate--methyl 2-methylprop-2-enoate (1/1)HCID 62802—

Reaction Steps

Cellulose (200 g, Harmac fully bleached Douglas Fir pulp available from MacMillan Bloedel, Stamford, CT) was dispersed in water (9.5 l) by mechanical agitation under nitrogen purging for two hours. A mixture of butyl acrylate (200 g) and methyl methacrylate (20 g) was vigorously stirred into the pulp for one-half hour. Graft copolymerization was initiated by addition of ceric ammonium nitrate (11 g, 0.02M) in 1M nitric acid (500 ml). The graft copolymerization was allowed to proceed for four hours, during which the color of the aqueous portion went from yellow (Ce4) to colorless (Ce3) indicating the oxidation of cellulose and initiation of polymerization. The reaction was neutralized with sodium carbonate (26.5 g, 0.25 M), filtered by suction, and washed with water (5 l). The sample was dried overnight at 90° C. to give a white fiber product (405 g, 93% conversion). The cellulose graft copolymer was extracted by refluxing with tetrahydrofuran (9 l) for three hours to remove homopolymer, filtered and dried to yield cellulose/butyl acrylate/methyl methacrylate fibers (200 g/177 g, 53 wt. % cellulose/47 wt. % butyl acrylate/methyl methacrylate, 86% graft efficiency).

Provenance & Evidence

DOI10.6084/m9.figshare.5104873.v1
Patent numberUS04765982
Source datasetuspto-grants-1988_08
ORD IDord-2548f1f26ad649c8805369e662cb133a
Source noteuspto-grants-1988_08