Participants
| Role | Name | HCID | Charge |
|---|
| Reactant | Phenol | HCID 996 | — |
| Reactant | Cyclohexanone | HCID 7967 | — |
| Reactant | Phenol cyclohexane | HCID 21202897 | — |
| Reactant | HCID 178418361 | HCID 178418361 | — |
| Reactant | HCID 178515949 | HCID 178515949 | — |
| Catalyst | Palladium | HCID 23938 | — |
| Solvent | Cyclohexane | HCID 8078 | — |
| Product | Phenol | HCID 996 | — |
| Product | Cyclohexanol | HCID 7966 | 2% |
Reaction Steps
In the case of hydrogenating phenol through a phenol hydrogenation process of prior art, for example by using an alumina-supported palladium catalyst, and introducing a mixed solution of phenol and cyclohexane with a phenol/cyclohexane molar ratio of ½ at a phenol flow rate of 0.0135 mol/hr into a hydrogen gas stream (hydrogen/phenol molar ratio=5.4) and carrying out reaction at 230° C., at the start of the flow reaction 98% cyclohexanone and 2% cyclohexanol were produced at a phenol conversion ratio of 77%. However, with this method, there is a drawback that a drop in activity and hence a drop in the conversion ratio occurs due to carbonaceous matter accumulating on the catalyst, and hence the conversion ratio became 63% thirty minutes after the start of the reaction, 55% after 1 hour, 44% after 2 hours, and 42% after 8 hours. Moreover, with this method, experimental operation using only phenol was difficult, and hence the phenol had to be used with harmful cyclohexane as a solvent (N. Mahata and V. Vishwanathan, Journal of Catalysis, 196, 262-270 (2000)).
Provenance & Evidence
| DOI | 10.6084/m9.figshare.5104873.v1 |
|---|
| Patent number | US07250537B2 |
|---|
| Source dataset | uspto-grants-2007_07 |
|---|
| ORD ID | ord-db1299e6a46949fba6e445f8473a9ad0 |
|---|
| Source note | uspto-grants-2007_07 |
|---|