HuagongsheHuagongshe Chemistry Print Report · For research reference only
HRID 1751742Generated: October 28, 2026
4-Methylmorpholine → HCID 178455975, compound
https://huagongshe.com/reaction/1751742
Participants
| Role | Name | HCID | Charge |
|---|
| Reactant | 4-Methylmorpholine | HCID 7972 | — |
| Reactant | Methanaminium, N-((dimethylamino)(3H-1,2,3-triazolo(4,5-b)pyridin-3-yloxy)methylene)-N-methyl-, hexafluorophosphate(1-) (1:1) | HCID 9886157 | — |
| Reactant | (2S)-2-((methoxycarbonyl)amino)-3-methylbutanoic acid | HCID 10942966 | — |
| Reactant | HCID 178455977 | HCID 178455977 | — |
| Solvent | Hydrochloric Acid | HCID 313 | — |
| Solvent | Ethanol | HCID 702 | — |
| Solvent | Dimethylformamide | HCID 6228 | — |
| Product | HCID 178455975 | HCID 178455975 | 71.3% |
Reaction Steps
tert-butyl (2S,4S)-2-[9-(2-{(2S,4S)-1-[N-(methoxycarbonyl)-L-alloisoleucyl]-4-methylpyrrolidin-2-yl}-1H-imidazol-5-yl)-1,11-dihydroisochromeno[4′,3′:6,7]naphtho[1,2-d]imidazol-2-yl]-4-(methoxymethyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (105 mg, 0.13 mmol) in 1.25 N HCl in EtOH (3 mL) was heated to 50° C. for 3 h and then concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was treated with (S)-2-(methoxycarbonylamino)-3-methylbutanoic acid (32 mg, 0.18 mmol), HATU (59 mg, 0.16 mmol) and DMF (1.3 mL), then N-methylmorpholine (0.043 mL, 0.39 mmol) was added dropwise. After 3 h, the mixture was quenched with 1N HCl (0.100 mL) and then purified by HPLC to afford methyl {(2S)-1-[(2S,4S)-2-(9-{2-[(2S,4S)-1-{(2S,3R)-2-[(methoxycarbonyl)amino]-3-methylpentanoyl}-4-methylpyrrolidin-2-yl]-1H-imidazol-5-yl}-1,11-dihydroisochromeno[4′,3′:6,7]naphtho[1,2-d]imidazol-2-yl)-4-(methoxymethyl)pyrrolidin-1-yl]-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl}carbamate (80 mg, 71%).
Provenance & Evidence
| DOI | 10.6084/m9.figshare.5104873.v1 |
|---|
| Patent number | US09156823B2 |
|---|
| Source dataset | uspto-grants-2015_10 |
|---|
| ORD ID | ord-3ebbbeaf1db74f4282952ce457e3271c |
|---|
| Source note | uspto-grants-2015_10 |
|---|