Back
HuagongsheHuagongshe Chemistry Print Report · For research reference only
HRID 2040597Generated: October 27, 2026

Tributylamine → 1,8-Diazabicyclo(5.4.0)undec-7-ene

https://huagongshe.com/reaction/2040597

Reaction equation

Participants

RoleNameHCIDCharge
ReactantTributylamineHCID 7622—
ReactantTbpbHCID 10092649—
ReactantBis(3-triethoxysilylpropyl)fumarateHCID 131731040—
CatalystTetrabutylammonium BromideHCID 74236—
Product1,8-Diazabicyclo(5.4.0)undec-7-eneHCID 81184—
ProductTbpbHCID 10092649—

Reaction Steps

All the GC area % values in 3 hours were low, suggesting that the reaction was sluggish even at 140° C. and in the presence of catalysts. When 4 mol % of TBAB was used as the catalyst in Batch 2, the GC area % of bis(3-triethoxysilylpropyl)fumarate decreased from 10.8% in 3 hours to 5.0% in 18 hours. This resulted from quick degradation of TBAB in the first 3 hours at 140° C., as evidenced with a strong GC signal of the degradation product, tributylamine. Thus, TBAB was not a suitable catalyst for synthesis of bis(3-triethoxysilylpropyl)fumarate under these conditions. In the non-polar solvent, mineral spirit, in Batch 1, the reaction rate was further reduced as the GC area % was only 4.2% after 3 hours. Thus, a non-polar solvent was deemed detrimental to the reaction rate under these conditions. When the high temperature catalyst TBPB was used in Batch 5, the conversion was comparable to that of TBAB in 3 hours, but much higher than that of TBAB in 18 hours, indicating that TBPB was a better catalyst than TBAB for preparation of bis(3-triethoxysilylpropyl)fumarate under these conditions. DBU gave similar GC area % as TBPB in both 3 and 18 hours in Batch 3, suggesting that DBU was as efficient as TBPB. When 2 mol % of DBU octyl bromine quat was used as the catalyst in Batch 6, the conversion was low in 3 hours, but higher than those of DBU and TBPB in 18 hours. Without wishing to be bound by theory it is thought that there probably was an activation mechanism for DBU octyl bromine quat, and once activated, it was more efficient than DBU and TBPB. The most significant conversion gain in this example was achieved by doing the DBU-catalyzed reaction in the high polarity aprotic solvent, DMF, in Batch 4. There was a marginal lead of the GC area % in 3 hours and a remarkable superiority in 18 hours. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is thought that the high GC area % in 18 hours could be attributed to an increased reaction rate, and a reduced association of bis(3-triethoxysilylpropyl)fumarate and CPTES with the solid salts in DMF. Therefore, it is thought that a high temperature catalyst, a polar aprotic solvent, or a combination thereof, can be used to improve the reaction conversion.

Provenance & Evidence

DOI10.6084/m9.figshare.5104873.v1
Patent numberUS08580886B2
Source datasetuspto-grants-2013_11
ORD IDord-a0e4a14b9dbd4b5497121a81bd3f3083
Source noteuspto-grants-2013_11