Participants
| Role | Name | HCID | Charge |
|---|
| Reactant | Acetic Acid | HCID 176 | — |
| Reactant | Acetone | HCID 180 | — |
| Reactant | Ammonia | HCID 222 | — |
| Reactant | Hydrogen Peroxide | HCID 784 | — |
| Reactant | Sulfuric Acid | HCID 1118 | — |
| Reactant | Aniline | HCID 6115 | — |
| Reactant | Peracetic Acid | HCID 6585 | — |
| Reactant | 2-Propanone, 2-phenylhydrazone | HCID 66026 | — |
| Reactant | Acetazine | HCID 79085 | — |
| Solvent | Methanol | HCID 887 | — |
| Product | Azobenzene | HCID 2272 | 80.5% |
| Product | Peracetic Acid | HCID 6585 | — |
Reaction Steps
A crude peracetic acid solution was prepared by mixing 17.3 g glacial acetic acid (0.29 mole), 7.2 g of a hydrogen peroxide solution having 68% by weight of H2O2 (0.145 mole of H2O2), and 0.7 g concentrated sulphuric acid, and reacting the mixture for several hours at ambient temperature. A solution was obtained which contained 0.10 mole peracetic acid and 0.033 mole uncoverted hydrogen peroxide, and which was introduced into 200 ml of methanol at 0° C. Within the space of half an hour 34.8 g acetone (0.6 mole), 12.2 g of an ammonia solution having 28% by weight NH3 (0.2 mole), and 18.6 g aniline (0.2 mole) were added, after which the mixture was determined by gas phase chromatography to contain 4.6 g of acetone phenylhydrazone (0.031 mole, which was 31% of the theoretical yield compared to the peracid), 1 g of acetone azine (0.009 mole, which was 9% of the theoretical yield), and 0.025 mole of azobenzene.
Provenance & Evidence
| DOI | 10.6084/m9.figshare.5104873.v1 |
|---|
| Patent number | US03943132 |
|---|
| Source dataset | uspto-grants-1976_03 |
|---|
| ORD ID | ord-3e1ee578b431452a8f9b2f5c7c58ed6b |
|---|
| Source note | uspto-grants-1976_03 |
|---|