HCID 178507853, compound → 2,3-Dihydroxybutanedioate
Reaction equation
[CH:1]1[C:2]([NH2:15])=[N+:3]([O-:14])[C:4]([NH2:13])=[N:5][C:6]=1[N:7]1[CH2:12][CH2:11][CH2:10][CH2:9][CH2:8]1.[C:16]([CH:19]([CH:21]([C:23]([O-:25])=[O:24])[OH:22])[OH:20])([O-:18])=[O:17].C1C(N)=[N+]([O-])C(N)=NC=1N1CCCCC1>O>[C:16]([CH:19]([CH:21]([C:23]([O-:25])=[O:24])[OH:22])[OH:20])([O-:18])=[O:17].[CH:1]1[C:2]([NH2:15])=[N+:3]([O-:14])[C:4]([NH2:13])=[N:5][C:6]=1[N:7]1[CH2:12][CH2:11][CH2:10][CH2:9][CH2:8]1.[C:16]([CH:19]([CH:21]([C:23]([O-:25])=[O:24])[OH:22])[OH:20])([O-:18])=[O:17]Participants
Reactant 2
Product 2
Reagents, catalysts & solvents 1
Procedure
In this Example and Comparative Example, a solution of 0.5 weight % minoxidil tartrate in deionized water was prepared. The minoxidil tartrate solution contained a mixture of minoxidil ions and tartrate ions that were formed by dissociation of minoxidil tartrate in the solution. The minoxidil tartrate solution was injected into the component 12 in Example 5 and into the component 14 in Comparative Example 6. It is believed that the minoxidil tartrate solution was absorbed substantially uniformly into both the component 12 and the component 14 in Example 5. The amount of the minoxidil tartrate solution that was injected into the electrode of Example 5 was 4 cc, and the amount of the minoxidil tartrate solution that was injected into the electrode of Comparative Example 6 was 3 cc, as seen in Table 6 below.
Sources & evidence
- ORD record
- ord-299c1a8c2fe049c292bce40945278613
- Source dataset
- uspto-grants-1999_01
- Patent number
- US05857993
Reaction notes
Loading…