Thiodiglycol → Deoxycholic Acid

HRID 1296194Notes

Reaction equation

HRID 1296194 reaction equation
C(O)CS[CH2:4][CH2:5][OH:6].CC(CC([C:16]1[CH:21]=[CH:20][C:19](OCCOCCO)=[CH:18][CH:17]=1)(C)C)(C)C.CCCCCCCCCCCC[O:41]CCO.[CH3:45][CH2:46][CH2:47][CH2:48][CH2:49][CH2:50][CH2:51][CH2:52][CH2:53][CH2:54][CH2:55][CH2:56][O:57][S:58]([O-:61])(=[O:60])=[O:59].[Na+:62].[CH3:63][C@@H:64]([C@@H:84]1[C@@:88]2(C)[C@@H:89]([OH:104])[CH2:90][C@@H:91]3[C@@:96]4([CH3:102])[CH2:97][CH2:98][C@@H](O)C[C@H:95]4C[C@@H](O)[C@H]3[C@@H:87]2CC1)[CH2:65][CH2:66][C:67](NCCC[N+](CC(O)CS([O-])(=O)=O)(C)C)=[O:68]>>[CH3:45][CH2:46][CH2:47][CH2:48][CH2:49][CH2:50][CH2:51][CH2:52][CH2:53][CH2:54][CH2:55][CH2:56][O:57][S:58]([O-:61])(=[O:60])=[O:59].[Na+:62].[CH3:63][C@@H:64]([C@@H:84]1[C@@:88]2([CH3:87])[C@@H:89]([OH:104])[CH2:90][C@@H:91]3[C@@:96]4([CH3:102])[CH2:97][CH2:98][C@@H:5]([OH:6])[CH2:4][C@H:95]4[CH2:18][CH2:17][C@H:16]3[C@@H:21]2[CH2:20][CH2:19]1)[CH2:65][CH2:66][C:67]([OH:68])=[O:41]

Participants

7

Reactant 5

HCID 5447ThiodiglycolHCID 247502-(Dodecyloxy)ethanolHCID 24775Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-((1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenyl)-omega-hydroxy-, potassium salt (1:1)HCID 1221453-((3-Cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio)-2-hydroxy-1-propanesulfonateHCID 3423265Sodium Lauryl Sulfate

Product 2

HCID 222528Deoxycholic AcidHCID 3423265Sodium Lauryl Sulfate

Procedure

The FIG. 7 shows the results. The samples were loaded on the gels in the following order (from left to right) lane-1 control sample, lane 2-3 thiodiglycol, lane 4-5 Tween-20, lane 6-7 NP-40, lane 8-9 Brij-35, lane 10 SDS, lane 11 CHAPSO, 12-13 Triton-X100, lane 14 CHAP and lane 15 control. The electrophoresis results shows (after a comparison of several typical runs) that, with exception of SDS and de-oxycholate treated protein samples, most protein samples containing detergent showed batch to batch variation in protein precipitation yield. The protein precipitation yield depended on the techniques used for harvesting the precipitated protein. There were occasions when the precipitation yield of duplicate samples varied between 100% to 50%. Protein samples containing SDS invariably showed substantially 100% yield in multiple tests.

Sources & evidence

ORD record
ord-f27bc0fc73334de58d4f85664daabf79
Source dataset
uspto-grants-2007_07
Patent number
US07244828B2

Reaction notes

Loading…