Participants
| Role | Name | HCID | Charge |
|---|
| Reactant | Citric Acid | HCID 311 | — |
| Reactant | Triethyl Citrate | HCID 6506 | — |
| Reactant | Acetonitrile--water (1/1) | HCID 18373917 | — |
| Solvent | Acetonitrile | HCID 6342 | — |
| Product | HCID 8029997 | HCID 8029997 | — |
| Product | HCID 57345948 | HCID 57345948 | — |
Reaction Steps
Citric acid and its ethyl esters (mono, di and tri) were quantitatively analyzed on a Hewlett-Packard 1090 HPLC using a reversed phase C18 column (Novapak, 3.9 mm×150 mm) held at 40° C. Water/acetonitrile (ACN) mixtures, buffered at pH=1.3, were used as mobile phase (1.0 ml/min) in a gradient mode (0% ACN (t=0) to 60% ACN (t=20 min) to 90% ACN (t=25 min) to 0% ACN (t=28 min)), and species were quantified by UV detection (Hitachi L400H) at a wavelength of 210 nm. Citric acid (CA) and triethyl citrate (TEC) were identified and quantified by comparing HPLC retention time and peak area with their respective calibration standard. Standards for monoethyl citrate (MEC) and diethyl citrate (DEC) could not be obtained commercially. On a mass basis, the response factor values for CA and MEC were found to be the same; therefore MEC and DEC were each assigned the same response factor value as corresponding to TEC. Using these response factor values, the carbon balance for each reaction sample, based on citric acid and its esters, was in the range of ±10%.
Provenance & Evidence
| DOI | 10.6084/m9.figshare.5104873.v1 |
|---|
| Patent number | US07667068B2 |
|---|
| Source dataset | uspto-grants-2010_02 |
|---|
| ORD ID | ord-48a549b136d64e40a7d2f47dadef829c |
|---|
| Source note | uspto-grants-2010_02 |
|---|