Carbon Tetrachloride → HCID 12955538, compound

HRID 2255374Notes

Reaction equation

HRID 2255374 reaction equation
O[CH2:2][CH2:3][N:4]1[CH2:9][CH:8]([CH3:10])[O:7][CH:6]([CH3:11])[CH2:5]1.C1(P(C2C=CC=CC=2)C2C=CC=CC=2)C=CC=CC=1.C(Cl)(Cl)(Cl)[Cl:32]>>[Cl:32][CH2:2][CH2:3][N:4]1[CH2:9][CH:8]([CH3:10])[O:7][CH:6]([CH3:11])[CH2:5]1

Participants

4

Conditions

Temperature
0 °C

Procedure

To a flask was added 5.0 g. (0.03 mole) of 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2,6-dimethylmorpholine in 50 ml. of carbon tetrachloride followed by 10.2 g. (0.04 mole) of triphenylphosphine. The mixture was stirred at reflux for three hours, then the reaction was cooled to 0° C., the triphenylphosphine oxide was filtered and the solvent stripped. The residue was dissolved in 10% aqueous hydrochloric acid and the by-products were extracted into ethyl acetate. The acid layer was then basified with ammonium hydroxide and extracted into ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate solution was dried with magnesium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated. The crude product was further purified by flash chromatography to give 2.31 g. (43% yield) of 4-(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dimethylmorpholine as a colorless liquid.

Workup

  1. additionTo a flask was added 5.0 g
  2. temperatureat reflux for three hours
  3. filtrationthe triphenylphosphine oxide was filtered
  4. dissolutionThe residue was dissolved in 10% aqueous hydrochloric acid
  5. extractionthe by-products were extracted into ethyl acetate
  6. extractionextracted into ethyl acetate
  7. dry with materialThe ethyl acetate solution was dried with magnesium sulfate
  8. filtrationfiltered
  9. concentrationconcentrated
  10. customThe crude product was further purified by flash chromatography
  11. customto give 2.31 g

Sources & evidence

ORD record
ord-3c01799ec72a4355b3297254bf6f3ea4
Source dataset
uspto-grants-1993_08
Patent number
US05240925

Reaction notes

Loading…