Triethylamine → m-PEG4-succinimidyl carbonate

HRID 1044639Notes

Reaction equation

HRID 1044639 reaction equation
[CH3:1][O:2][CH2:3][CH2:4][O:5][CH2:6][CH2:7][O:8][CH2:9][CH2:10][O:11][CH2:12][CH2:13]O.C1C(=O)N([O:22][C:23]([O:25][N:26]2[C:31](=[O:32])[CH2:30][CH2:29][C:27]2=[O:28])=[O:24])C(=O)C1.C(N(CC)CC)C.C(OCC)(=O)C.CO>C(#N)C>[CH3:1][O:2][CH2:3][CH2:4][O:5][CH2:6][CH2:7][O:8][CH2:9][CH2:10][O:11][CH2:12][CH2:13][O:22][C:23](=[O:24])[O:25][N:26]1[C:27](=[O:28])[CH2:29][CH2:30][C:31]1=[O:32]

Participants

6

Procedure

Tetraethylene glycol monomethyl ether (1.0 g, 4.8 mmol) and N,N′-disuccinimidyl carbonate (1.48 g, 5.8 mmol) were dissolved in acetonitrile (10 mL). Then triethylamine (1.0 mL, 7.2 mmol) was added and the reaction stirred overnight at room temperature. Crude reaction was evaporated to dryness, dissolved in sat. NaHCO3 (30 mL), washed ethyl acetate (2×30 mL), dried MgSO4, and evaporated to dryness. Column chromatography (Silica, ethyl acetate/MeOH, 20:1) afforded 1 a clear oil (0.462 g, 28% yield).

Workup

  1. customCrude reaction
  2. customwas evaporated to dryness
  3. dissolutiondissolved in sat. NaHCO3 (30 mL)
  4. washwashed ethyl acetate (2×30 mL), dried MgSO4
  5. customevaporated to dryness

Sources & evidence

ORD record
ord-6e590d836e7249b4a72efc9a084ca0e2
Source dataset
uspto-grants-2013_10
Patent number
US08563685B2

Reaction notes

Loading…