Dimethylformamide → 5-[(2'-oxospiro[furo[2,3-f][1,3]benzodioxole-7,3'-indol]-1'(2'H)-yl)methyl]thiophene-2-carbonitrile

HRID 1259784Notes

Reaction equation

HRID 1259784 reaction equation
Br[C:2]1[S:6][C:5]([CH2:7][N:8]2[C:16]3[C:11](=[CH:12][CH:13]=[CH:14][CH:15]=3)[C:10]3([C:20]4=[CH:21][C:22]5[O:26][CH2:25][O:24][C:23]=5[CH:27]=[C:19]4[O:18][CH2:17]3)[C:9]2=[O:28])=[CH:4][CH:3]=1.[CH3:29][N:30](C)C=O>O.[C-]#N.[Zn+2].[C-]#N.C1C=CC(/C=C/C(/C=C/C2C=CC=CC=2)=O)=CC=1.C1C=CC(/C=C/C(/C=C/C2C=CC=CC=2)=O)=CC=1.C1C=CC(/C=C/C(/C=C/C2C=CC=CC=2)=O)=CC=1.[Pd].[Pd].C1(P(C2C=CC=CC=2)[C-]2C=CC=C2)C=CC=CC=1.[C-]1(P(C2C=CC=CC=2)C2C=CC=CC=2)C=CC=C1.[Fe+2]>[O:28]=[C:9]1[C:10]2([C:20]3=[CH:21][C:22]4[O:26][CH2:25][O:24][C:23]=4[CH:27]=[C:19]3[O:18][CH2:17]2)[C:11]2[C:16](=[CH:15][CH:14]=[CH:13][CH:12]=2)[N:8]1[CH2:7][C:5]1[S:6][C:2]([C:29]#[N:30])=[CH:3][CH:4]=1

Participants

7

Reactant 2

HCID 6228DimethylformamideHCID 666427871'-[(5-bromo-2-thienyl)methyl]spiro[furo[2,3-f][1,3]benzodioxole-7,3'-indol]-2'(1'H)-one

Product 1

HCID 592634335-[(2'-oxospiro[furo[2,3-f][1,3]benzodioxole-7,3'-indol]-1'(2'H)-yl)methyl]thiophene-2-carbonitrileYield 44%

Reagents, catalysts & solvents 4

HCID 962WaterCatalystHCID 11186Zinc cyanide (Zn(CN)2)CatalystHCID 635956Ferrocene-1,1'-bis-(diphenylphosphine)CatalystHCID 9811564Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumCatalyst

Procedure

A mixture of 1′-[(5-bromo-2-thienyl)methyl]spiro[furo[2,3-f][1,3]benzodioxole-7,3′-indol]-2′(1′H)-one (0.23 g, 0.49 mmol), zinc cyanide (0.07 g, 0.59 mmol), tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium(0) (0.10 g, 0.11 mmol), 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (0.06 g, 0.11 mmol), N,N-dimethylformamide (6.00 mL) and a catalytic amount of water (2 drops) was heated at 120° C. for 24 hours. After cooling down to ambient temperature, the organic solvent was evaporated in vacuo. The residue was extracted with ethyl acetate (5×15.0 mL) and the combined organic solution was passed through a bed of celite. The filtrate was successively washed with saturated aqueous ammonium chloride (25.0 mL), water (2×35.0 mL) and brine (40.0 mL). The organic layer was dried over sodium sulfate and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to dryness. The residue was subjected to column chromatography eluted with 20-35% ethyl acetate in hexanes to afford solid which was further purified by preparative thin layer chromatography, eluted with 20% ethyl acetate in hexanes to afford the title compound (0.09 g, 44%): 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.50 (d, 1H), 7.32-7.16 (m, 2H), 7.12-7.04 (m, 2H), 6.86 (d, 1H), 6.51 (s, 1H), 6.08 (s, 1H), 5.87 (d, 2H), 5.10 (ABq, 2H), 4.78 (ABq, 2H); MS (ES+) m/z 403.0 (M+1).

Workup

  1. customthe organic solvent was evaporated in vacuo
  2. extractionThe residue was extracted with ethyl acetate (5×15.0 mL)
  3. washThe filtrate was successively washed with saturated aqueous ammonium chloride (25.0 mL), water (2×35.0 mL) and brine (40.0 mL)
  4. dry with materialThe organic layer was dried over sodium sulfate
  5. filtrationfiltered
  6. concentrationThe filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to dryness
  7. washeluted with 20-35% ethyl acetate in hexanes
  8. customto afford solid which
  9. customwas further purified by preparative thin layer chromatography
  10. washeluted with 20% ethyl acetate in hexanes

Sources & evidence

ORD record
ord-7e47049c57e24549bb81f2db45ff926c
Source dataset
uspto-grants-2013_06
Patent number
US08466188B2

Reaction notes

Loading…